Is a reconsideration application not intended as an opportunity for parties to submit information that they should have put forward?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Pearce v. Moksha Yoga Kelowna and another (No. 2), 2015 BCHRT 19 (CanLII):
In Dela Merced v. Aluminum Curtain Wall System and another, 2011 BCHRT 342, a reconsideration application is “not intended as an opportunity for parties to submit information that they should have previously put forward”.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the effect of the intention or understanding of a party to a transaction where a party intended to transfer a vehicle to another party? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the law of agency apply when one party gives explicit or implicit authority to another party (the principal) to enter contracts with third parties? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances can a party to an application request to redact a section of a document that contains a private but clearly irrelevant information? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the proper procedure for counsel for the prevailing party in an ex parte application to obtain an order from the affected party? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a party has intended to injure another party in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a party opposing a Rule 28 application have standing to argue the actual merits of the application? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the grounds for reconsideration in a workers’s reconsideration application? (British Columbia, Canada)
In making a preliminary determination on a judicial review application, is it appropriate for the parties to conduct a detailed legal analysis of the parties' positions? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a non-party party to a Treaty 8 application joinder to the same issue at a later date? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a successful party have the right to claim special costs when the successful party is in a relationship with an opposing party? (British Columbia, Canada)
