In deciding what is a "reasonable" excuse, it is proper to take into account the purpose of the legislation, which, as Martin J.A. says in Regina v. Taraschuk, supra, at p. 163: " … is to provide a compulsory breath test as an aid to the early detection of persons driving or having the care or control of motor vehicles while their ability to drive a motor vehicle is impaired by alcohol or drugs and, who, consequently, represent a threat to the safety of the public."
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.