The appellant raises several questions in his submissions: 1. Did the accused’s evidence support his defence of reflex action? 2. Were the trial judge’s reasons adequate? 3. Did the trial judge misapprehend the significance of the evidence with respect to the reflex defence? 4. Did the trial judge improperly apply the test in R v. W (D)? 5. Was the trial judge’s sentence excessive?
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.