An accused person is entitled to rely upon all alternate defences for which a foundation of fact appears in the record and it matters not whether the evidence forming this foundation emanates from the Crown or the defence. What is essential is that the record contains evidence which, if accepted by the trier of fact, would constitute a valid defence to the charge laid. (See Wu v. The King, [1934] S.C.R. 309).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.