While the comment was unfortunate, in our view, and would have better been left unsaid, we are not persuaded it would give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias, as that concept is described in the jurisprudence. It would not have led a reasonable and right-minded person, informed and viewing the matter realistically and practically, and who had thought the matter through carefully, to conclude that the trial judge was biased: see R v. R.D.S., 1997 CanLII 324 (SCC), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484, at para. 111. The threshold for a finding of bias is necessarily high because such a finding calls into question the integrity of the administration of justice: R.D.S., at paras. 112, 117.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.