Is there any case law or case law that supports the argument that a judge should consider some of the issues before the trial of the others?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Kovach v. Linn, 2010 ONCA 126 (CanLII):

Related to these concerns is the long-ago expressed judicial admonition of Meredith C.J. in Waller v. Independent Order of Foresters, [1905] O.J. No. 361, 5 O.W.R. 421 (Div. Ct.), at p. 422 O.W.R., that bears repeating: Experience has shewn that seldom, if ever, is any advantage gained by trying some of the issues before the trial of the others is entered upon . . .

Other Questions


How has the trial judge considered the totality of evidence at trial for impaired driving? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any case law that supports a motion judge finding that a plaintiff has a genuine issue for trial over an unpaid bonus? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a review court assume that a trial judge considered certain issues in a written decision? (Ontario, Canada)
Can punitive damages be certified as a common issue for the first common issues trial? (Ontario, Canada)
When will a motion judge consider whether to grant access to a person with mobility issues on an interim or temporary basis? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will a trial judge consider corroborating evidence in a sexual assault case? (Ontario, Canada)
What factors will a judge consider when awarding costs at trial? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any case law that supports the argument that a party who is not a qualified expert should be considered a negligent individual? (Ontario, Canada)
In a non-jury sexual assault action, in what circumstances will the judge and jury consider the issue of delay and prejudice? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will a judge in a sexual assault case be found to have objected to the words of the Judge at the trial of the accused? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.