What is the authority for how to judge the sufficiency of reasons?

New Brunswick, Canada


The following excerpt is from R v Grosseth, 2019 NBQB 137 (CanLII):

That’s the end of my quote with respect to R v. R.E.M. and the authority for how to judge the sufficiency of reasons. On this appeal I am satisfied that the trial judge, on the record as a whole, dealt with the impugned essential elements of the offence, whether they are viewed as volitional conduct (that is, the actus rea) or as intent (that is, the mens rea) and that she did so in the proper analytical context (that is, W.D.)

Other Questions


What factors must a judge consider in assessing a child's "best interests" when assessing a parent’s reasons for moving to a new location? (New Brunswick, Canada)
Is sufficient "constitutional facts" sufficient to establish Charter violations? (New Brunswick, Canada)
Does a motion judge commit any reversible error in her application of the Divorce Act? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the test for establishing a reasonable assumption of jurisdiction in real and substantial connection? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is a mortgagee's duty to secure a reasonable price for a property subject to foreclosure and sale? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What authority does the court have to revoke an agreement where an agreement has been signed where the agreement was not revoked? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the meaning of the word "reasonable person" in the assessment of credibility? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the test for appeal against a finding that a judge committed a “palpable and overriding error” on the basis of error? (New Brunswick, Canada)
Is there a conflict in the assessment of reasonableness between two separate decisions? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the reasonable notice period for an employee to claim damages for non-payment of severance? (New Brunswick, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.