What is the test for appeal against a finding that a judge committed a “palpable and overriding error” on the basis of error?

New Brunswick, Canada


The following excerpt is from Baisley v. R., 2015 NBQB 33 (CanLII):

The first ground of appeal is an issue which required the trial judge to apply legal principles to a determined set of facts. It should be characterized as a question of mixed law and fact. In my view, it involved the trial judge’s interpretation of the evidence as a whole and therefore the test is whether the judge committed a “palpable and overriding error” (Housen v. Nikolaisen, supra, at para. 36).

Other Questions


Does a judge make a palpable and overriding error of fact when exercising costs in a personal injury case? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What grounds of appeal apply to a finding of fact in a motion of appeal? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the test for “palpable and overriding error”? (New Brunswick, Canada)
Does a motion judge commit any reversible error in her application of the Divorce Act? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the test for reversing a decision of a trial judge on a motion of appeal against a finding of not guilty? (New Brunswick, Canada)
Is interference justified on the basis that the trial judge misapprehended the evidence? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the standard of review for errors attributed to a trial judge? (New Brunswick, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the findings of the Court of Appeal in the context of a claim for damages arising out of a motor vehicle accident? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the case law on the basis of a mother’s argument that a child is entitled to a reduction in the amount of child support if she stops working? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the test for a motion judge to seek maximum contact with each parent? (New Brunswick, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.