First, the weight to be given this close temporal connection should not be overstated. Indeed, the unpersuasive nature of this kind of reasoning is so well recognized that the courts have developed the Latin maxim of post hoc ergo propter hoc to capture the deficiency of such reasoning. Ehrcke J. provided a helpful illustration of this maxim in White v. Stonestreet, 2006 BCSC 801:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.