In Brayshaw v. Sommerfeld (1996), 24 C.P.C. (4th) 262 (B.C.S.C.), the court summarized the jurisprudence on resort to Rule 18A in personal injury actions (at para. 9): In my view, upon consideration of these Judgments, personal injury damage assessments are capable of a proper Rule 18A disposition when: (a) The claim is a modest one and work loss is minimal; (b) There is no suggestion of malingering; (c) There is nothing complicated about the case; (d) There is an absence of any obvious or serious inconsistencies in the evidence or anything to suggest the claim is bogus and, (e) There is no serious issue as to the plaintiff's credibility.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.