Courts have granted applications for a permanent injunction where it is likely that the defendant will continue to publish defamatory statements about the plaintiff. In a recent Ontario decision, Astley v. Verdon, 2011 ONSC 3651, 106 O.R. (3d) 792 (Ont. Sup. Ct.), the court stated at paras. 20 and 21: 20 It is well‑settled law that, in appropriate circumstances, a court may grant an injunction to prevent a defendant from continuing to disseminate defamatory material that affects a plaintiff’s reputation: ... 21 Permanent injunctions have consistently been ordered after findings of defamation where either: (1) there is a likelihood that the defendant will continue to publish defamatory statements despite the finding that he is liable to the plaintiff for defamation; or (2) there is a real possibility that the plaintiff will not receive any compensation, given that enforcement against the defendant of any damage award may not be possible: ... . [Citations omitted]
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.