Perdue C.J.M. stated in Rex v. Hoffman at C.C.C. 366: Proof that liquor was brought upon his premises surreptitiously, without his knowledge or consent, does not render him guilty of an offence. The statute did not intend that a man should be declared guilty in such a case. It is incredible that there was any intention of authorising so monstrous an injustice. The prohibition in the statute is that no person 'shall have’ liquor on the premises, not that he shall be liable if there 'is' liquor on the premises.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.