The petitioner says that references to “shares,” “equal shares,” “equally divided” or “issue” tend to support a per capita distribution, and gifts to issue without mention of the method of distribution should, prima facie, be interpreted as a per capita gift, unless there is specific context in the will or surrounding circumstances to displace that presumption. On this point, the petitioner notes cases such as Adams v. Laursen, 1998 CanLII 5883 (B.C.S.C.), where J. Edwards J. wrote, at paras. 10-12:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.