British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Jacobs v Basil, 2017 BCSC 1339 (CanLII):
The standard of care to be applied to drivers is that of a reasonably prudent motorist in light of all the circumstances. Motorists are not required to anticipate all foreseeable road hazards, but only those that are reasonably foreseeable. The standard of care of a driver is not one of perfection, but whether the driver acted in a manner in which an ordinarily prudent person would act: Hadden v. Lynch, 2008 BCSC 295, at para. 69.
A driver’s obligation to take evasive action to avoid hitting a pedestrian only arises when he or she becomes aware, or ought to have become aware, that the pedestrian was not going to obey the law: Beauchamp v. Shand, 2004 BCSC 272, at para. 33.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.