7 That view was expressed in greater detail in MacGyver v. Richards, 22 O.R. (3d) 482, by Abella J.A.: When therefore a court has been asked to decide what is in a child's best interests and a choice must be made between the responsible wishes and needs of the parent with custody and the parent with access it seems to me manifestly unfair to treat these wishes and needs as being on an equal footing. When one adds to this the dimension that a court's decision ought to favour the possibility that the former partners can get on with their lives and responsibilities, one reaches the admittedly difficult conclusion that a parent with custody, acting responsibly, should not be prevented from leaving a jurisdiction because the move would interfere with access by the other parent with the child, even if the relationship between the child and the access parent is a good one. (p. 492)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.