Does interference with legal privilege imply prejudicially affected cases?
Canada (Federal), Canada
The following excerpt is from A.G. (Que.) v. Greater Hull School Board, [1984] 2 SCR 575, 1984 CanLII 29 (SCC):
64. In Ottawa Separate Schools Trustees v. Ottawa Corporation, supra, it states at p. 81: It is possible that an interference with a legal right or privilege may not in all cases imply that such right or privilege has been prejudicially affected.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is there any case law in which a plaintiff has been granted privileged privilege in a civil case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the legal basis for a "legally sound" defense in drug trafficking cases? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor's use of a cockroach analogy in a criminal case affect the jury's ability to judge the case impartially? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the legal standard for reviewing the legal sufficiency of evidence in a criminal case? ("New York", United States of America)
What is the test for a judge to decide a case without any interference from the Chief Justice? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Does the disclosure of non-payment of legal fees constitute solicitor-client privilege? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Is there any case law where a court has considered that a child's development would be adversely affected if their mother left for Haiti? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the legal test for an allegation that the indictment is insufficient to allege exceptions to criminal liability created by section 474 of the Interference with Defense Investigation Act? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What are some cases where a jury has been found guilty of perverting the course of justice in a civil case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is there any case law or case law that supports a finding that a statement by a Canadian migration integrity officer in Port-au-Prince (the MIO) in Haiti does not constitute torture? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
