When dealing with documents referred to in an affidavit is not necessary to consider relevance to the questions in issue?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from 2169460 Ontario Limited et al. v. Dass, 2020 ONSC 5 (CanLII):

My former colleague’s observations continue: 28 When dealing with documents referred to in affidavits, it is not necessary to consider relevance to the questions in issue. A party which tenders evidence is open to being examined on that evidence. [see Caputo v. Imperial Tobacco Inc. (2002), 25 C.P.C. (5th) 78 (Master) at para. 14]

Other Questions


Is there any case law that states that documents that are not relevant to the pleadings must be shown in the Affidavit of Documents? (Ontario, Canada)
What is considered scandalous in the context of allegations that are not relevant to the issue? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the distinction between questions of law, questions of fact and questions of mixed law and fact? (Ontario, Canada)
How has the BCSC considered the relevance of the relevant historical context in determining just cause? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for using the term issue "issue" in the context of the issue? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a party who fails to assert privilege over a document be served with a supplementary affidavit of documents in which the privilege is properly claimed? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a party required to disclose in its affidavit of documents (Schedule C) all documents formerly in their possession but no electronic or paper copy? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances have courts considered confidentiality regarding documents for a matrimonial property issue? (Ontario, Canada)
What relevance does relevance exist in the context of relevance? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a person who has voluntarily taken stock in a corporation be estopped from questioning the light of the company to issue stock? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.