How has the meaning of "extent of use" been interpreted in s.44(1)(a) of the National Security Act?
Nova Scotia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Morrison v. Morrison, 2013 NSSC 358 (CanLII):
In Fisher v. Fisher, 2001 NSCA 18 (N.S.C.A.) Cromwell J.A., as he then was, interpreted the meaning of “extent of use” in s.4(1)(a) of the Act at paras 44 to 51. In para. 51, he states as follows:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for interpreting section 3 of the National Statutory Interpretation Guidelines? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the interpretation of taxation statutes? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How has the Court interpreted the meaning of s.23(2) of the Criminal Code? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the meaning of words in the construction of statutes? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the meaning of a contract where a lot of land is excluded? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is Economical's case law on security for costs? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How has the Charter of Rights and Freedoms been interpreted? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What grounds are sufficient to raise an arguable issue within the meaning of Article 4.03? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the effect of new legislation on the interpretation and application of the new legislation? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Is child care expenses pursuant to s.7(1)(a) of the Canada Social Security Act, s.8(2)(a), required to be extraordinary? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
