The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, like other constitutional documents, has been afforded a special status. The classic statement of the interpretive approach to be taken to constitutional documents was stated in Edwards v. A.-G. Can., 1929 CanLII 438 (UK JCPC), [1930] 1 D.L.R. 98, [1929] 3 W.W.R. 479, [1930] A.C. 124 (P.C.), where Lord Sankey wrote [at pp. 106-7]: The B.N.A. Act planted in Canada a living tree capable of growth and expansion within its natural limits. The object of the Act was to grant a constitution to Canada. • • • • • Their Lordships do not conceive it to be the duty of this Board ... to cut down the provisions of the Act by a narrow and technical construction, but rather to give it a large and liberal interpretation.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.