New evidence should only be received after judgment has been rendered on the merits if the applicant can satisfy the court on the balance of probabilities that: a) a miscarriage of justice would occur without the re-hearing; and b) the evidence or argument he now seeks to present on would have changed the result at the trial. On these points the applicant would likely succeed: See Akkor v. Roulston, 2009 BCSC 1584.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.