How have the courts interpreted the admissions made in the settlement agreement?
Nova Scotia, Canada
The following excerpt is from MacRury v. Keybase Financial Group Inc., 2016 NSSC 159 (CanLII):
The trial judge went on to give a second decision in the trial proper (National Bank v. Potter 2013 NSSC 248). He considered and interpreted the admissions made in the settlement agreement, as part of his consideration of the whole of the evidence.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have the courts interpreted the terms of the minutes of a settlement agreement where a husband and wife's insurance policies were to be revoked? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the interpretation of taxation statutes? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted a shareholder's agreement in a transfer of shares? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for interpreting section 3 of the National Statutory Interpretation Guidelines? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the law on title to after-acquired goods in the absence of fraud? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How has the court dealt with the issue of the admissibility of filed affidavits and documents? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Is a settlement agreement a form of contract? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for admitting a settlement agreement? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for upholding an agreement where the terms of the agreement are not clearly defined? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What are the consequences if a party rejects an offer of settlement that subsequently exceeds the award of the court after trial? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
