How have courts interpreted the law on title to after-acquired goods in the absence of fraud?
Nova Scotia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Royal Bank of Canada v. Madill, 1981 CanLII 2995 (NS CA):
Hagarty C.J.O. reviewed Holroyd v. Marshall (1861), 10 H.L.C. 191, 11 E.R. 999, and concluded [at pp. 507-8] that in the absence of fraud the title to after-acquired goods may prevail as against execution creditors.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts interpreted the interpretation of taxation statutes? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the terms of the minutes of a settlement agreement where a husband and wife's insurance policies were to be revoked? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a landowner who has claimed colourable title to land be able to oust the title of the true owner of the land? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the argument that solicitor-client privilege is not absolute? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for interpreting section 3 of the National Statutory Interpretation Guidelines? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the admissions made in the settlement agreement? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How have courts dealt with a mortgage that purported to cover goods that may not be owned by the mortgagor? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted a shareholder's agreement in a transfer of shares? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Does the absence of actual notice of a tax sale constitute fraud? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How has the Court interpreted the meaning of s.23(2) of the Criminal Code? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
