I cannot agree that mutual mistake will preclude the application of this part of the test. I follow the reasoning of Moldaver, J. in Uxbridge, supra, where he agreed with the principle enunciated by Blair J., in Beaudoin v. Aubin, supra, that evidence of mutual mistake is not only not fatal to a claim for possessory title, but that "such evidence is both relevant and material on the issue of intent. Indeed, it may, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, be sufficient to establish the requisite intent".
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.