What are some cases where reconstruction and bio-mechanical engineering have been called to a jury trial?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from Stuparyk v. Schultz, 2007 ABQB 639 (CanLII):
Murdoch v. Balfour, 2002 ABQB 494 was a case featuring a low-impact accident where there was no indication that the plaintiff had pre-existing symptoms. A jury trial was granted in that case, although, in addition to expert reports in reconstruction and bio-mechanical engineering, it was expected that 24 treating medical personnel would be called to give evidence.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the case law in the United States when it comes to the case of a lay-man who is not qualified to stand trial? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the case law on case-by-case privilege? (Alberta, Canada)
Is there any case law where a trial judge was bound to apply the concept of the last clear chance extracted from the case? (Alberta, Canada)
How has the trial judge determined the individual share of family expenses in a personal injury case? (Alberta, Canada)
What are the arguments raised by the trial judge in a motor vehicle accident case for damages for years lost by a plaintiff who is not injured but injured? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the case law on interposition in cases where interposition was sought? (Alberta, Canada)
What remedies are available to Engine Block in the case of 514.1/514? (Alberta, Canada)
Is there any case law or case law in which a defence counsel has been found to have made out deficiencies in the credibility assessment? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the case law on division of property where inflation and the increase in the value of the property since the time of trial is due to inflation? (Alberta, Canada)
Is there any case law that supports the argument that the use of evidence that could not have been obtained but for the purposes of the trial was unfair? (Alberta, Canada)
