The issue before the Arbitrator was whether the appellants had erected screens on the exclusive use common element area without the consent of MTCC in violation of the Condominium Act, the Declaration and the Rules. The Arbitrator was required to be correct in his interpretation of the Condominium Act and in his award of costs (Housen v. Nikolaisen, at para. 8.) Decision of the Arbitrator
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.