In Kanis v. Sinclair the patient consented before surgery to sterilization by means of clipping the fallopian tube as opposed to the other methods of cauterizing or cutting the tube. The patient believed the clipping method had a greater chance of being reversed in the event she wished to have a child. The consent referred only to an operation which would result in sterilization without specifying the alternative methods. The physician cauterized the tube without the consent of the patient.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.