In Law Society of Upper Canada v. Mucha, 2008 ONLSAP 5 (CanLII), the appeal panel at paras. 23 and 28 found that revocation is the ordinary penalty for knowing participation in mortgage fraud. The public interest must be the overriding consideration in such cases, and only “extraordinary or exceptional circumstances” permit a departure from a disposition of revocation. Such circumstances could include “compelling psychiatric or psychological evidence” that could explain why the misconduct occurred, why the actions were out of character and why it was unlikely to happen again.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.