In Mucha, the Appeal Panel said at para. 28 (emphasis in the original) that: As noted earlier, we do not suggest that there can never be exceptional circumstances justifying departure from the ordinary disposition of revocation where the licensee has knowingly participated in mortgage fraud. By way of illustration only, there may be compelling psychiatric or psychological evidence that, among other things, credibly indicates not only that the misconduct was out of character and unlikely to recur, but explains why it occurred: See Law Society of Manitoba v. MacIver, [2003] L.S.D.D. No. 29. …
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.