What is the test for compensating for the economic opportunity cost resulting from a joint decision by one spouse to remain at home?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from M.M.N. v. D.K., 2003 BCSC 997 (CanLII):

The compensatory approach is premised on the notion that the economic opportunity cost resulting from a joint decision for one spouse to remain at home should be borne equally upon the breakdown of the relationship (Moge v. Moge (1992), 1992 CanLII 25 (SCC), 43 R.F.L. 3rd 345 (S.C.C.)) This has no application on the facts of the case at hand.

Other Questions


What is the proper remedy in a common law common law relationship where the parties acquired a joint home as joint ownership of Crowe Road jointly owned by the parties? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a spouse entitled to a spouse's pension as a capital asset as a result of the other spouse’s absence of other assets in favour of the pension? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an award of compensatory spousal support be justified by the existence of either an economic disadvantage to the payee spouse or an economic advantage to the Payor spouse? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a spouse's relationship with the other spouse affect the presumption of resulting trust in the transferor and the transferee? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for the purpose of compensating a recipient spouse for sacrifices made by the recipient spouse in assuming primary childcare and household responsibilities? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the BC Supreme Court of Justice order a further review order to order that an expert in economic forecasting of the economic circumstances of a separated spouse be reviewed? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a defendant entitled to a 65% share of the joint net worth as a result of his disproportionate contribution to the parties jointly net worth? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for the purpose of compensating the recipient spouse for economic disadvantage arising from the marriage? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the standard of review apply to a review of a Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal decision to which the decision was patently unreasonable? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does s. 215.5(7) of the BCSC prohibit the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles from extending the decision date of a decision until after the date of the decision has been determined? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.