The defendants implicitly acknowledged the benefits of the recommended physical therapy because they criticized the plaintiff for his having failed to pursue them already and so improve his position after the Accident. The award for loss of future earning capacity is premised on the plaintiff’s having mitigated his damages in future. Based on the medical evidence, I find the recommended treatment is reasonably necessary to promote the plaintiff’s mental and physical health: Milina v. Bartsch, (1985) 1985 CanLII 179 (BC SC), 49 B.C.L.R. (2d) 33 (S.C.) at para. 44.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.