Most cases trace the modern distinction between criminal and regulatory offences back to Sherras v. DeRutzen, [1895] Q.B.918. The issue of mens rea arose in the case of a publican who had sold liquor to a non-duty constable. He had assumed that the constable was off duty because the constable, before entering the pub, had removed his armband. Wright J. held that mens rea is presumed to exist subject to certain exceptions, one of which is “acts which…are not criminal in any real sense but are acts which in the public interest are prohibited under a penalty.”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.