Does a review date set after a fixed date need to be reviewed?

Although the facts are quite different, I am attracted to the approach of Monnin, C.J.Q.B. in Hrabarchuk v. Todosey, 2005 MBQB 301, [2005] M.J. No. 504 wherein he set a review date permitting the payor to have his ongoing obligation (in particular, the indefinite nature of same) reviewed after a fixed date without the necessity of establishing the change of circumstances required to support a variation of an existing order (see para. 60 of Hrabarchuk, supra).