There is case precedent stating that an unequal distribution of matrimonial property is justified when matrimonial debt increases largely due to the inexplicable inaction of one of the spouses. When one spouse fails to take measures to prevent a decrease in matrimonial assets despite the fact that those measures were readily available, it may be inequitable to order an equal division of assets: Layden v. Layden, [1996] A.J. No. 489.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.