What is the difference between proprietary and personal aboriginal title?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Delgamuukw v. British Columbia, 1993 CanLII 4516 (BC CA):

In Mabo v. Queensland, Mr. Justice Brennan, at p.36, said that the right of each member of the community claiming aboriginal rights and title in land might well be personal, whereas the rights of the community might well be proprietary. Mr. Justice Toohey, at p.152, said that the question of whether the aboriginal title was proprietary or personal was ultimately fruitless and unnecessarily complex.

Other Questions


In an aboriginal rights and title case, how have the courts considered expert evidence in aboriginal cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
If a person acts within their legal rights, is that person liable even if another person suffers a loss? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the trial judge considered aboriginal perspective in the context of aboriginal title claims? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a party have to prove aboriginal right or title before there is a duty to consult with the aboriginal peoples? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the case law on aboriginal intervention in aboriginal title cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between the role of the approving officer and the court on an appeal under s. 89 of the Land Title Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff’s personal injury fund available for use in a personal injury litigation deduction? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can one person's invitation to touch another person's penis constitute an assault? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action for damages for personal injury, what is the current state of the law on pain? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the impact of personal experiences on the assessment of non-pecuniary damages in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.