In Taku River Tlingit First Nation v. Tulsequah Chief Mine Project 2002 BCCA 59, it was argued that aboriginal right or title had to be established before there was duty to consult with the aboriginal peoples. In rejecting the argument, Rowles J.A. held that while the onus of proving a prima facie infringement of an aboriginal right or title is on the group challenging the legislation (or in this case the decisions of the statutory decision makers), it did not follow that until there was court ruling the right did not exist. (¶ 183)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.