What is the preponderance of evidence supporting a finding that a front end loader driver's front-end loader hit a pot hole on October 11, 2016?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from A1701726 (Re), 2017 CanLII 95719 (BC WCAT):
Applying the test in Faryna v. Chorny, I find the preponderance of evidence supports a finding that the worker’s front-end loader hit a pot hole on October 11, 2016 and that he suffered immediate low back symptoms from that incident, diagnosed as a low back strain with sciatica.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the medical evidence that supports medical evidence in support of future care costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the preponderance of evidence supporting the respondent's claim that his interest in the Mazraa Property constitutes excluded property? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the fact that an expense relates to an extracurricular activity bring the amount of child support under s. 7 of the Child Support Guidelines (e.g. expenses) into s.7 of the child support table? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the Property Assessment Appeal Board err in law in finding that there was no evidence to support the negative impact of a midden on the subject property? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a finding that a judge must not make a finding which would directly contradict a finding previously made by another judge? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the grounds of appeal against a finding that a jury's verdicts are unreasonable and not supported by the evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the BCSC find that evidence of J.B. and her evidence be inconsistent in relation to particular events? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a trial judge have to consider the evidence that supports a finding of criminal negligence in a dangerous driving case? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a adjudicator's reasoning be manifestly flawed where the adjudicator failed to consider the evidence supporting the findings of two witnesses? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the applicable law for a driver who is not a dominant driver but a servient driver? (British Columbia, Canada)
