I make this finding bearing in mind that limitation periods are not to be ignored and that the general purpose of limitation periods is the public interest. There is a presumption of prejudice after the passage of a limitation period, however slight, which may be rebutted with evidence that the defendant [at para. 20] "knew, within the limitation period, of the case and the nature of the claims now being made against him". The defendant would then be required to show actual prejudice: see Deaville v. Boegeman. [See Note 21 below]
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.