In the case of Swiderski v. Broy Engineering Ltd. (1992), 11 O.R. (3d) 544 (Div.Ct.), at p. 601, the court held that the onus is on the plaintiff to disprove prejudice on a motion to add defendants after the expiry of the limitation period: There is no automatic right to an amendment simply because the respondent cannot establish prejudice. Were it otherwise, the expiration of a limitation period would never have any reliable consequence.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.