What is the test for agreeing to agree with the particulars?
Canada (Federal), Canada
The following excerpt is from Banda v. Correctional Service Canada, 2021 CHRT 19 (CanLII):
The parties do not have to agree with the particulars, the perceptions contained in the particulars or what arguments they believe will be derived from the particulars (see Leung v. Canada Revenue Agency, 2012 CHRT 7 at para 29).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When one agrees to join a conspiracy, does one agree to all acts that have or will be committed by the conspiracy? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the meaning of "made and agreed to make payments" in a civil case apply to a charge of making and agreeing to give anything of value? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the withholding of removal statute allow the Attorney General to designate crimes such as assault as particularly particularly serious even if they are not aggravated felonies? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a jury have to agree unanimously on a particular theory of second degree murder liability? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Are there any cases in which particulars were ordered of bald denials? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Is a plaintiff required to conform to any particular procedure or rule of evidence in an adversary proceeding? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Can a government employee be convicted under Section 208(a) of the Criminal Code of the United States for failing to disclose a conflict of interest in a particular matter? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the parties agreed to delay consideration of certification of a class action against Morgan Stanley? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the second branch of the test concerning the reasonableness of the internal flight alternative in the context of the claimant's particular circumstances? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
When will counsel's failure to seek unanimity instruction on the specific predicates Aller agreed would be committed in the course of the conspiracy? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
