The following excerpt is from United States v. Eagle, D.C. No. 4:11-cr-00032-SEH-1, No. 11-30352 (9th Cir. 2013):
Section 208(a) regulates a limited set of "particular matters," generally arising out of discrete matters with a direct impact on the government employee's finances. See 5 C.F.R. 2640.103(a)(1) (listing examples that involve the award and maintenance of government contracts, specific hiring decisions, and use of a particular business's services). Illustrative cases under 208(a) underscore the link between the conflict and a real, rather than speculative, interest in a particular matter. See, e.g., United States v. Selby, 557 F.3d
Page 21
968, 975 (9th Cir. 2009) (per curiam) (employee whose husband earned commission from a software sale to the government had sufficient financial interest to sustain conviction under 208(a) where she had actively lobbied for increased use of her husband's software); United States v. Jewell, 827 F.2d 586, 587 (9th Cir. 1987) (financial interest requirement of 208(a) was met where the government employee signed invoices authorizing payment to his own company); United States v. Smith, 267 F.3d 1154, 1156-57 (D.C. Cir. 2001) (referral of patients to specific mental health clinic to which defendant had loaned money was sufficient under 208(a)).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.