The Appellants raise a number of cases of lease cancellation payments in which the tenant was the recipient, not the payor. The question in these cases was, as suggested by Justice Reed in Westfair Foods Limited v. The Queen:[2] "Whether the amount is being paid as a replacement for the loss of a capital asset or as the replacement for income."
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.