In Law v. Law, supra, Fleury, L.J.S.C., observed at 463: "A father-child relationship is more than a simple economic dependency. The father is burdened with heavy financial responsibilities and the child has a very few duties in return. It seems reasonable to demand that a child who expects to receive support entertain some type of relationship with his or her father in the absence of any conduct by the father which might justify the child's neglect of his or her filial duties." This passage was cited with approval in Farden v. Farden, supra, and Anderson v. Anderson, supra.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.