In support of this ruling Seaborn J. referred to MacMillan v. Layden [2002] N.J. No. 256 where Fowler J. said: (para 23) Where there is ambiguity or uncertainty in a clause or a term in an agreement concerning child support and where both parties have had legal advice, I am of the opinion that the clause should be interpreted to the benefit of the child.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.