Finally, in Hargreaves v. Spence (1983), 1983 CanLII 421 (BC SC), 45 B.C.L.R. 367 (BCSC), the court concluded that the combined effect of the vendor's acceptance of the purchaser's agreement to forfeit a deposit directly to the vendor if a land sale transaction did not complete, combined with the standard reference in the purchase agreement to the fact that a deposit would be forfeited as liquidated damages, should be construed as an agreement to accept the deposit as liquidated damages, and abandonment of any right to a claim for specific performance or damages arising from the breach.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.