Where a contract of purchase and sale requires that a deposit be paid in a certain way, but the deposit is paid in a different way, the court may also find that the deposit has been effectively paid, even though technical compliance with the contract has not been conducted: Kaler v. Scales [2009] B.C.J. No. 681, (B.C.S.C.) at paras. 81-84. i.e. If substantial compliance has been fulfilled, the payor should be relieved from terms of strict fulfillment on equitable grounds.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.