The following excerpt is from Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada, Local 30 v. Irving Pulp & Paper, Ltd., [2013] 2 SCR 458, 2013 SCC 34 (CanLII):
As a consequence of this legislative choice, labour arbitrators are entitled to a “protected zone of deference” (Nor-Man, at para. 43) in which the courts should not willingly enter as competing “arbiters of labour policy” (CAIMAW v. Paccar of Canada Ltd., 1989 CanLII 49 (SCC), [1989] 2 S.C.R. 983, at p. 1005, per La Forest J.). That is especially so because unwarranted judicial intervention risks short-circuiting negotiations between management and labour by delivering through judicial fiat what the legislature has said should be subject to collective bargaining between the parties.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.