She states that she has suffered hardship and inconvenience because she is in difficult financial circumstances and requires the sole proceeds of the property in order to continue to support herself. In addition, she continues to incur expenses with regard to the maintenance of the property, including the payment of taxes. She argues that the certificate of pending litigation has no more than a nuisance value and should not interfere with her legitimate rights. (See Kamil v. Transtide Industries Ltd., [1980] B.C.J. No. 1902).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.