Does the 9 month delay in scheduling for a hearing on a motion for an application for Charter status constitute a Section 11(b) Charter issue?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from R. v. T.C., 2004 ABQB 455 (CanLII):
I also do not believe that this nine month court scheduling delay constitutes a Section 11(b) Charter situation such as discussed in Regina v. Askov supra.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the standard of review analysis in the context of section 2(b) of the Charter, section 4(b), section 5 (b) and section 6 of the PIPA? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a stay of execution of a motion for an application for a motion to overturn a motion of appeal? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the courts dealt with the issue of custody and custody issues in a motion of motion of the same name? (Alberta, Canada)
Does a random stop of a motor vehicle violate section 10(b) of the Charter? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a waiver of section 10(b) of the Charter valid and effective? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on the right of an applicant at a medical malpractice hearing to file new evidence at the hearing? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a motion for a declaration proceed in the absence of any other remedy for the respondents in the context of a breach of their Charter of Charter Rights? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for a stay of execution of an application for a motion to stay of a motion for a separation? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for a motion to dismiss an application for a delay of more than two years? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for the application of section 7 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms? (Alberta, Canada)
