In the present case, there has been no restriction placed on the worker’s right to file new evidence at the hearing. The worker’s representative has not questioned the credibility or expertise of the physicians. He has not reviewed their opinions and identified potential errors, incomplete facts or unsubstantiated conclusions. We rely on Kuntz v. College of Physicians, 4 A.C.W.S. (3d) 337 where the court denied cross examination when the applicant’s affidavit failed to identify facts that were wrong or sources of information that were unreliable. ...
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.