Is third party culpability evidence speculative in a murder case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Carranza, B239697 (Cal. App. 2013):
two shooters. (People v. Brady (2010) 50 Cal.4th 547, 559, fn. 5 [third party culpability evidence was speculative because it did not create "a lingering doubt by suggesting someone other than defendant was responsible for the murder"].) Thus, we conclude that the trial court did not err.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for evidence of third party culpability in a murder case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for allowing evidence of third party culpability in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for presenting evidence of third party culpability in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
Is third party culpability evidence in a federal civil case permissible? (California, United States of America)
Is third party culpability admissible in a murder case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for third party culpability in a murder case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for evidence of third party culpability in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
Does the exclusion of third party culpability evidence in a criminal case violate a defendant's right to present a defense? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for presenting evidence of third party culpability in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admissible third party culpability evidence in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
